A girl in Afghanistan was seen being brutally flogged in public for allegedly flouting the Taliban's conservative rule that prohibits girls from going to retailers and not using a male guardian. In an virtually two-minute video clip, posted on Twitter by a consumer named Shabnam Nasimi, reportedly from the Takhar province, the girl could be seen being whipped. Hindustan Occasions can not independently confirm the video.

"The ladies of Afghanistan are experiencing hell on earth below Taliban regime. We mustn't flip a blind eye," Shabnam Nasimi wrote together with the video.

Final week, three girls and 11 males have been flogged following the orders of an Afghan court docket after they have been discovered responsible of theft and "ethical crimes", it was reported.

These being punished acquired between 21 and 39 lashes every, after being convicted in a neighborhood court docket of theft and adultery, studies stated including that lots of of individuals attended the lashings and a ban was imposed on taking photographs and video.

The resumption of the apply underscored the Taliban's intention of sticking to their strict interpretation of Islamic regulation, or Sharia. Supreme chief Hibatullah Akhundzada additionally ordered judges final month to completely implement elements of Islamic regulation that embody public executions and floggings.

The Taliban carried out punishments in public throughout their first rule that resulted in late 2001.


Days after Elon Musk vowed to restore public trust in Twitter, he revealed all inner communications pertaining to the censorship of the Hunter Biden story on the social media platform. The event passed off on Friday (US native time) throughout which the brand new Twitter chief shared a 37-tweet-long thread, posted by impartial journalist Matt Taibbi.

The mentioned Twitter thread detailed how the previous Authorized Head of the corporate, Vijaya Gadde, was on the helm of the censorship train underneath the garb of imprecise and arbitrary guidelines. It's pertinent to notice that Gadde was accused of refusing to take down little one porn even because the sufferer’s dad and mom had pleaded for elimination.

The inner communications revealed how the Twitter moderation staff routinely obtained directives from the Biden administration to censor tweets. “Extra to evaluation from the Biden staff,” learn a response by a Twitter government dated October 24, 2020.

Thus, it got here as no shock when the social media platform censored an article by the New York Put up, which printed an explosive story about Hunter Biden’s problematic emails with a Ukrainian gasoline firm government from Burisma within the run-up to elections. It's pertinent to notice that when the Hunter Biden story was censored, Biden was not in energy.

“Twitter took extraordinary steps to suppress the story, eradicating hyperlinks and posting warnings that it might be “unsafe.” They even blocked its transmission by way of direct message, a instrument hitherto reserved for excessive instances, e.g. little one pornography,” Matt Taibbi revealed.

In response to the impartial journalist, the Twitter moderation staff went forward with their crackdown and even locked the account of former White Home spokeswoman, Kaleigh McEnany.

This prompted an indignant letter from the marketing campaign staffer of Donald trump, Mike Hahn, who mentioned, “All she did was cite the story and firsthand reporting that has been reported by different retailers and never disputed by the Biden marketing campaign.”

I would like a solution instantly on when/how she will likely be unlocked…Like I mentioned, a minimum of faux to look after the subsequent 20 days,” he took potshots on the partisan behaviour of the Twitter moderation staff.

A number of staff famous that there was rigidity between the comms/coverage groups, who had little/much less management over moderation, and the protection/belief groups,” Matt Taibbi emphasised.

Twitter’s inner communication uncovered how the censorship was justified underneath the guise of the ‘hacked supplies coverage.’ “Per checking, the consumer was bounced by Website Integrity for violating our Hacked Supplies coverage. Including them right here for additional insights and steering,” a Twitter government had justified.

Matt Taibbi emphasised that the choice to censor the ‘Hunter Biden story’ was made on the highest stage of the corporate however Twitter founder Jack Dorsey was apparently not aware of it. He added that the previous Authorized Head of Twitter, Vijay Gadde, performed an important position within the course of.

They only freelanced it. Hacking was the excuse, however inside a number of hours, just about everybody realized that wasn’t going to carry. However nobody had the heart to reverse it,” a Twitter worker described the decision-making course of.

Former U.S. Coverage Communications Supervisor at Twitter, Trenton Kennedy, had expressed doubts over the way through which the New York Put up article was gutted.

“I’m struggling to grasp the coverage foundation for marking this as unsafe, and I believe the very best explainability argument for this externally can be that we’re ready to grasp if this story is the results of hacked supplies,” he remarked in the course of the inner Twitter dialogue.

“We’ll face arduous questions on this if we don’t have some form of strong reasoning for marking the hyperlink unsafe,” Kennedy had highlighted. Nonetheless, former Head of Belief & Security at Twitter, Yoel Roth, had justified the transfer.

He had mentioned, “The coverage foundation is hacked suppliesalthough, as mentioned, that is an rising state of affairs the place the information stay unclear. Given the extreme dangers right here and classes of 2016, we’re erring on the facet of together with a warning and stopping this content material from being amplified.”

A number of different prime Twitter executives, together with Brandon Borrman, had indicated that the ‘hacked supplies coverage’ invoked to withhold the Hunter Biden story was questionable. “Can we in truth declare that that is a part of the coverage?” he had inquired.

Matt Tabibi emphasised, “A basic downside with tech corporations and content material moderation: many individuals in control of speech know/care little about speech, and should be instructed the fundamentals by outsiders.”

The impartial journalist additionally identified how Indian-origin Democratic Congressman, Ro Khanna, expressed concern in regards to the censorship of the New York Put up article.

Vijaya Gadde, the previous Authorized Head at Twitter who was sacked after Elon Musk took cost of the corporate, had justified the choice to lock the account of White Home spokeswoman, Kaleigh McEnany. She additionally tried to rationalise the gutting of the ‘Hunter Biden story.’

“We put out a clarifying thread of Tweets earlier this night to clarify our coverage across the posting of personal data and linking on to hacked supplies,” she had mentioned.

“The press secretary’s account was not completely suspended – we requested that she delete the tweet containing materials that's in violation of our guidelines and her account is restricted till she complies,” Gadde additional remarked.

Matt Taibbi identified how Jack Dorsey was allegedly stored in darkness over the ‘Hunter Biden laptop computer story coverup.’

A tremendous subplot of the Twitter/Hunter Biden laptop computer affair was how a lot was completed with out the information of CEO Jack Dorsey, and the way lengthy it took for the state of affairs to get “unfucked” (as one ex-employee put it) even after Dorsey jumped in,” he concluded.

The Background of the Controversy

It's notable right here that within the final weeks of the 2020 US presidential elections, the New York Put up printed an explosive story about Hunter Biden’s problematic emails with a Ukrainian gasoline firm government from Burisma.

In its report, the information outlet alleged that that they had accessed materials from a broken Macbook that was delivered to a service centre for restore. The shopper who introduced the laptop computer by no means collected or paid for the providers.

The store proprietor mentioned he repeatedly tried to contact the shopper. Although he couldn't establish the proprietor as Hunter Biden, he mentioned the laptop computer had Beau Biden Basis’s sticker.

The report has a number of paperwork and mentions a video that proves that Joe Biden met a high-profile businessman from Ukraine when he was Vice President of the USA

Reports recommended that Biden could have helped his son Hunter utilizing his affect because the VP of the USA in his enterprise in Ukraine. The Biden Camp categorically denied all of the allegations.

It was closely censored by each Twitter and Fb and was branded as a bit of pretend information. Initially, the left and liberal cabal dismissed the report as a hoax, however it was finally confirmed that the laptop computer’s contents did actually belong to Hunter Biden.

Following the restriction of the NYP report, Twitter justified the motion by claiming that its insurance policies forbid the sharing of compromised data. After the elections have been over and Joe Biden was declared president, it later turned clear that the NY Put up story was true.



Two Indian-Individuals - Congressman Ro Khanna and Vijaya Gadde - prominently determine in US President Joe Biden's son Hunter Biden's laptop computer story whose full disclosure Twitter CEO Elon Musk has introduced could be launched on the micro-blogging website.

Musk, the world's richest man who bought Twitter final month, stated on Friday that he would launch particulars about what he characterised as Twitter's "suppression" of a controversial story achieved by the New York Submit newspaper about Hunter Biden's laptop computer that was printed earlier than the 2020 US election.

He additionally tweeted that it could be "superior" and there could be a "dwell Q&A" on the subject.


The story claimed to comprise emails retrieved from a laptop computer belonging to Hunter. The New York Submit stated it realized of the emails' existence from Trump's ex-White Home chief strategist Steve Bannon, and obtained the emails from Trump's private lawyer on the time Rudy Giuliani.

Twitter initially restricted the distribution of the story, citing considerations that it could possibly be the results of a international disinformation marketing campaign. However the social media firm shortly backtracked on its response, with then-CEO Jack Dorsey calling the choice to dam the hyperlink "unacceptable."

Ro Khanna is the Democratic Congressman representing Silicon Valley within the US Home of Representatives, whereas Vijaya Gadde, an legal professional

, served as normal counsel and the top of authorized, coverage, and belief at Twitter, earlier than she was fired by new boss and CEO Musk.

A collection of tweets together with inner communications of Twitter was launched by author Matt Taibbi concerning the allegations that the social media platform in the course of the 2020 election cycle had suppressed information and data associated to the laptop computer of Hunter.

In accordance with the knowledge launched by Matt Taibbi, Ro Khanna seems to have questioned the choice of Twitter to limit entry to an investigative report of the New York Submit newspaper on the laptop computer of Hunter.

As the knowledge began coming in, Musk in a tweet stated: "Ro Khanna is nice". Mr Khanna in a confidential e-mail to Vijaya Gadde opposed the so-called censorship by Twitter.

"I say this as a complete Biden partisan and satisfied he didn't do something fallacious. However the story now has change into extra about censorship than comparatively innocuous emails and it is change into an even bigger deal than it could have been," Ro Khanna wrote to Vijaya Gadde.

"Within the warmth of a presidential marketing campaign, limiting dissemination of newspaper articles (even when New York Submit is way proper) looks as if it would invite extra backlash than it would do good," Mr Khanna wrote to Vijaya Gadde and requested her to not share the textual content of their emails.

Mr Khanna stated that such a transfer by Twitter appears to be a violation of the first Modification ideas.

"If there's a hack of categorised data or different data that might expose a critical struggle crime and the NYT was to publish it, I believe NYT ought to have that proper. A journalist shouldn't be held accountable for the unlawful actions of the supply except they actively aided the hack," Mr Khanna stated.

In response to Mr Khanna's e-mail, Ms Gadde defended Twitter's coverage and its choice on the Submit story.

"We put out a clarifying menace of Tweets earlier this night to elucidate our coverage across the posting of personal data and linking on to hacked supplies," she wrote.

"The press secretary's account was not completely suspended – we requested that she delete the tweet containing materials that's in violation of our guidelines and her account is restricted till she complies," Ms Gadde wrote to Mr Khanna.

Matt Taibbi wrote that a few of the first instruments for controlling speech had been designed to fight the likes of spam and monetary fraudsters.

"Slowly, over time, Twitter employees and executives started to search out an increasing number of makes use of for these instruments. Outsiders started petitioning the corporate to govern speech as effectively: first a bit, then extra usually, then continuously," Mr Taibbi wrote.

"By 2020, requests from linked actors to delete tweets had been routine. One govt would write to a different: 'Extra to overview from the Biden workforce.' The reply would come again: 'Dealt with,'" he famous.

In accordance with Mr Taibbi, each events had entry to those instruments.

For example, in 2020, requests from each the Trump White Home and the Biden marketing campaign had been acquired and honoured. Nevertheless, this method wasn't balanced, he wrote.

"It was primarily based on contacts. As a result of Twitter was and is overwhelmingly staffed by individuals of 1 political orientation, there have been extra channels, extra methods to complain, open to the left (effectively, Democrats) than the precise," he stated in one of many tweets.





"The ensuing slant in content material moderation selections is seen within the paperwork you are about to learn. Nevertheless, it is also the evaluation of a number of present and former high-level executives," Mr Taibbi stated.



Blog Archive